Two sub-sections, and together they mean a Tribunal order never needs a fresh civil suit to enforce it — it already carries a civil court's decree-execution power built in.
30. (1) An order passed by the Appellate Tribunal under this Act shall be executable by it as a decree of civil court, and for this purpose, the Appellate Tribunal shall have all the powers of a civil court.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Appellate Tribunal may transmit any order made by it to a civil court having local jurisdiction and such civil court shall execute the order as if it were a decree made by that court.
Section 29 lets a person aggrieved by a Board order appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Section 30 answers the question that follows a decided appeal: once the Tribunal has ruled, how does that order actually get enforced if the losing party doesn't comply on its own.
An order passed by the Appellate Tribunal under the Act is executable by the Tribunal itself, as if it were a decree of a civil court — and for that purpose, the Tribunal holds all the powers of a civil court. There's no intermediate step of converting the order into something else first; the order is already treated as a decree the moment it's made.
Notwithstanding sub-section (1), the Tribunal may instead transmit its order to a civil court with local jurisdiction, and that civil court then executes the order as though it were a decree the court itself had made. This gives the Tribunal a practical choice: execute the order directly, or route it to a court sitting closer to wherever the paying party's assets or registered office actually are.
Section 30 is what stops an Appellate Tribunal order from being enforceable only in theory. Without it, a party that wins an appeal but faces a non-compliant opponent would need to start a separate civil suit just to get the original order enforced — an extra layer of delay and cost the Act deliberately avoids. Because 30(2) is framed as an option the Tribunal exercises, not a right the winning party can invoke on its own, whether execution happens directly through the Tribunal or through a local civil court is the Tribunal's call, driven by where enforcement is actually practical.
Illustration: a Data Fiduciary's appeal is dismissed, and the Appellate Tribunal upholds the Board's original penalty order. The Fiduciary doesn't pay. Rather than requiring the Board to file a fresh civil suit to recover the amount, the Tribunal can execute the order itself under 30(1) using civil-court powers, or transmit it under 30(2) to a civil court local to where the Fiduciary's assets sit — whichever route makes actual recovery more practical.
Section 29 is what produces the order Section 30 enforces. Section 28(7) gives the Board itself civil-court-equivalent powers at the inquiry stage; Section 30 gives the Appellate Tribunal an equivalent, decree-execution power at the enforcement stage — the same underlying idea of borrowing civil-court machinery, applied at a different point in the process. And once a penalty is actually collected, Section 34 is where those sums get credited — to the Consolidated Fund of India.
30 minutes to talk through your specific situation — no obligation.
Book a Consultation