DPDP Rules 2025 notified — enforceable 13 May 2027.|Time left: –d –h –m –s
What it covers

The full trade-off, not just a vendor shortlist

Consent scope, integration footprint and total cost — weighed across subscription, in-house build, and owned deployment, before any vendor conversation starts.

Consent scope & complexity assessment

How many purposes, channels and jurisdictions your consent architecture actually needs to handle.

Build vs. buy vs. own-and-deploy comparison

A straight look at the real trade-offs between a SaaS CMP subscription, an in-house build, and an owned codebase deployed on your own infrastructure.

Integration footprint

What systems — web, app, backend, CRM — the CMP would actually need to talk to.

Vendor shortlist evaluation

Where a market CMP is genuinely the right fit, evaluating specific vendors against your actual requirements, not a generic feature checklist.

Total cost of ownership

A real cost comparison across licensing, integration and long-term maintenance, not just sticker price.

What you get

A recommendation, not a sales pitch

Every comparison is weighed against your own requirements — not a separate scoring framework layered on top.

  • A requirements document specific to your consent architecture needs
  • A build/buy/own comparison, weighed against the same dimensions covered above — not a separate scoring apparatus layered on top
  • A shortlist evaluation (where relevant) of market CMP vendors against your specific requirements
  • A recommendation memo suitable for budget and technical decision-making
Process

Four stages, click any to see more

From requirements discovery to a recommendation, each stage narrows the real options down to what actually fits.

01

Requirements discovery

Understand your data flows, jurisdictions, and consent complexity.

Purposes, channels and jurisdictions get mapped first — the scope everything else in the evaluation gets weighed against.

02

Option mapping

Lay out the realistic paths — subscription, in-house build, owned deployment.

All three paths get laid out honestly, including the case for an owned, self-deployed platform over either alternative.

03

Comparative evaluation

Weigh each path against your actual requirements and constraints.

Judged against the same dimensions covered above — consent scope, build/buy/own trade-offs, integration footprint, vendor fit, and total cost of ownership — not a separate scoring apparatus.

04

Recommendation & debrief

Deliver a clear recommendation with the reasoning behind it.

A recommendation memo suitable for budget and technical decision-making, walked through directly rather than left as a standalone document.

Not sure whether to buy, build, or own your CMP?

30 minutes to walk through your actual requirements — no obligation.

Book a Consultation