DPDP Rules 2025 notified — enforceable 13 May 2027.|Time left: –d –h –m –s
Primary text — Section 8

8. (1) A Data Fiduciary shall, irrespective of any agreement to the contrary or failure of a Data Principal to carry out the duties provided under this Act, be responsible for complying with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder in respect of any processing undertaken by it or on its behalf by a Data Processor.

(2) A Data Fiduciary may engage, appoint, use or otherwise involve a Data Processor to process personal data on its behalf for any activity related to offering of goods or services to Data Principals only under a valid contract.

(3) Where personal data processed by a Data Fiduciary is likely to be— (a) used to make a decision that affects the Data Principal; or (b) disclosed to another Data Fiduciary, the Data Fiduciary processing such personal data shall ensure its completeness, accuracy and consistency.

(4) A Data Fiduciary shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure effective observance of the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder.

(5) A Data Fiduciary shall protect personal data in its possession or under its control, including in respect of any processing undertaken by it or on its behalf by a Data Processor, by taking reasonable security safeguards to prevent personal data breach.

(6) In the event of a personal data breach, the Data Fiduciary shall give the Board and each affected Data Principal, intimation of such breach in such form and manner as may be prescribed.

(7) A Data Fiduciary shall, unless retention is necessary for compliance with any law for the time being in force,— (a) erase personal data, upon the Data Principal withdrawing her consent or as soon as it is reasonable to assume that the specified purpose is no longer being served, whichever is earlier; and (b) cause its Data Processor to erase any personal data that was made available by the Data Fiduciary for processing to such Data Processor.

Illustrations. (I) X, an individual, registers herself on an online marketplace operated by Y, an e-commerce service provider. X gives her consent to Y for the processing of her personal data for selling her used car. The online marketplace helps conclude the sale. Y shall no longer retain her personal data. (II) X, an individual, decides to close her savings account with Y, a bank. Y is required by law applicable to banks to maintain the record of the identity of its clients for a period of ten years beyond closing of accounts. Since retention is necessary for compliance with law, Y shall retain X's personal data for the said period.

(8) The purpose referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (7) shall be deemed to no longer be served, if the Data Principal does not— (a) approach the Data Fiduciary for the performance of the specified purpose; and (b) exercise any of her rights in relation to such processing, for such time period as may be prescribed, and different time periods may be prescribed for different classes of Data Fiduciaries and for different purposes.

(9) A Data Fiduciary shall publish, in such manner as may be prescribed, the business contact information of a Data Protection Officer, if applicable, or a person who is able to answer on behalf of the Data Fiduciary, the questions, if any, raised by the Data Principal about the processing of her personal data.

(10) A Data Fiduciary shall establish an effective mechanism to redress the grievances of Data Principals.

(11) For the purposes of this section, it is hereby clarified that a Data Principal shall be considered as not having approached the Data Fiduciary for the performance of the specified purpose, in any period during which she has not initiated contact with the Data Fiduciary for such performance, in person or by way of communication in electronic or physical form.

Our interpretation

Sections 4 through 7 answer whether an organisation is allowed to process personal data in the first place. Section 8 answers what it has to do once it is. It applies to every Data Fiduciary, full stop — there's no size threshold, no sector carve-out, no "we're too small for this" exception written into the text. Section 9 layers extra duties on top for children's data and Section 10 layers extra duties on top for Significant Data Fiduciaries, but Section 8 is the floor everyone stands on regardless.

Accountability that can't be contracted away — 8(1)

A Data Fiduciary is responsible for complying with the Act "irrespective of any agreement to the contrary or failure of a Data Principal to carry out the duties" the Act gives her. Two things follow from that wording. First, no vendor contract, indemnity clause, or terms-of-service disclaimer shifts this liability away from the Fiduciary — you can allocate cost between yourselves privately, but the Board still holds the Fiduciary accountable. Second, a Data Principal's own carelessness — reusing a leaked password, ignoring a security notice — doesn't excuse the Fiduciary from its own obligations either.

Processors only under a valid contract — 8(2)

A Data Fiduciary may engage a Data Processor to handle personal data on its behalf, but only under a valid contract. There's no informal-arrangement exception — a cloud vendor, KYC agency, or mailing-list tool processing data on your instructions needs a written contract in place, and Rule 6(1)(f) expects that contract to specifically address security safeguards, not just commercial terms.

Data quality where it actually matters — 8(3)

Where personal data feeds a decision affecting the Data Principal, or gets disclosed to another Data Fiduciary, it has to be complete, accurate and consistent. This obligation is scoped, not universal — the Act isn't demanding perfect data hygiene everywhere, just wherever a decision or a downstream disclosure rides on the data being right.

Technical and organisational measures — 8(4)

A general duty to implement measures that make the Act's other provisions actually work in practice — access controls, role-based permissions, documented processes — rather than obligations that exist only on paper.

Security safeguards to prevent a breach — 8(5)

A Data Fiduciary must protect personal data in its possession or under its control — including data a Data Processor handles on its behalf — through reasonable security safeguards. Rule 6 spells out what "reasonable" covers in practice: encryption or similar protection, access controls, monitoring for unauthorised access, and data-processing agreements with processors. This is one of only two Section 8 duties (alongside 8(1)) that Section 17(1) refuses to exempt even for government functions otherwise carved out of Chapter II — the legislature treated basic security as non-negotiable.

Breach intimation — 8(6)

When a breach happens, the Data Fiduciary has to notify the Board and every affected Data Principal, in the form and manner Rule 7 prescribes. That rule splits notification into an immediate step and a 72-hour follow-up report — covered in full on our Rule 7 explainer — and it's the single most operationally demanding duty in this section, because it runs on a clock that starts the moment you become aware, not the moment you've finished investigating.

Erasure once the purpose ends — 8(7), 8(8), 8(11)

Unless retention is separately required by law, a Data Fiduciary must erase personal data once consent is withdrawn, or once it's reasonable to assume the specified purpose no longer applies — and it must cause its Data Processors to do the same with any data it handed them. Sub-section (8) defines when a purpose counts as "no longer served": once the Data Principal stops approaching the Fiduciary for that purpose and stops exercising her rights, for a period Rule 8 and the Third Schedule prescribe per class of Fiduciary. Sub-section (11) clarifies that silence counts — a Data Principal is deemed not to have approached the Fiduciary during any period she initiated no contact at all, in person or electronically.

A published contact point — 8(9)

The business contact information of a Data Protection Officer (where one's required) or another person able to answer questions has to be published, in the manner Rule 9 prescribes — not buried in a privacy policy's final paragraph.

A working grievance mechanism — 8(10)

An "effective mechanism to redress the grievances of Data Principals" is a functional requirement, not a form on a webpage nobody monitors — the Act cares whether grievances actually get resolved, not just whether a channel technically exists.

Why this matters in practice

Section 8 is where enforcement will concentrate, because it's where the Schedule's steepest penalties attach — a security failure under 8(5) or a mishandled breach under 8(6) can draw penalties up to ₹250 crore under Section 33, scaled by the seven factors Section 33(2) lists. Most organisations already have something in place for notice, consent, and rights requests; far fewer have tested whether their breach-response plan would actually meet Rule 7's timelines under real pressure, or whether their processor contracts genuinely cover what 8(2) and Rule 6(1)(f) require rather than just referencing "applicable law" in general terms.

Illustration: a company outsources payroll processing to a third-party vendor. The vendor is a Data Processor; the company remains the Data Fiduciary and stays on the hook under 8(1) for the vendor's compliance. If the vendor suffers a breach exposing employee salary data, it's the company — not the vendor — that has to notify the Board and every affected employee under 8(6), on Rule 7's timeline, regardless of whose system actually failed.

How Section 8 connects to the rest of the Act

Section 4 sets the lawful basis Section 8's obligations then attach to; Section 7's legitimate uses feed into the same processing Section 8 governs. Section 9 adds extra restrictions on top of 8's baseline for children's data, and Section 10 adds extra obligations on top of it for Significant Data Fiduciaries — in both cases, Section 8 still applies underneath, not instead of. On the Rules side, Rule 6 details the security safeguards 8(5) requires, Rule 7 details the breach-notification process 8(6) requires, Rule 8 details the retention timelines behind 8(7)-8(8), and Rule 9 details the publication format 8(9) requires.

Would your breach-response plan actually meet Rule 7's timeline under real pressure?

30 minutes to talk through your specific data footprint — no obligation.

Book a Consultation